Call Us: (520) 882-8080
Hollingsworth Kelly Law Firm - Tucson AZ
  • HOME
  • RESULTS
    • Settlements and Verdicts
    • Client Reviews
  • OUR FIRM
    • Meet Our Team
    • Video Library
    • Recognition
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Medical Malpractice
      • Wrongful Death
      • Birth Injury
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Nursing Home Negligence
      • Surgical Errors
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents
      • Car Accidents
      • Motorcycle Accidents
      • Bicycle Accidents
      • Drunk Driving Accidents
      • Pedestrian Accidents
      • Truck Accidents
    • Catastrophic & Serious Injury
      • Brain Trauma
      • Catastrophic and Serious Injury
      • Child Injury
      • Dram Shop Liability
      • Spinal Injury
    • Personal Injury
      • Dog Bite Injury
      • Personal Injury
      • Premises Liability
      • Swimming Pool Accidents/Drownings
      • Product Liability
      • Wrongful Death
  • NEWS & PRESS
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • Menu Menu

Arizona Court of Appeals, Div. 2, Interprets Pre-Judgment Interest Rate in Metzler v. BCI Coca-Cola

August 28, 2013/in Uncategorized/by Hollingsworth Kelly Law Firm
In an opinion published today in Metzler v. BCI Coca-Cola, the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division 2, determined that a plaintiff who beats her Rule 68 offer to confess judgment is still entitled to 10 percent interest on the amount of her unliquidated claims, contrary to the defense bar and insurance companies’ interpretation of the law.

In July 2011, the State Legislature amended A.R.S. 44-1201, the statute governing interest rates applicable to legal matters, and changed the interest rate from 10% to 1% plus the prime rate (currently 4.25%) for “interest on any judgment.” Since then, the defense community has argued at the trial court level, often with success, that this change in the law applied to the interest rate applicable to Rule 68 offers. Plaintiff Metzler and her attorneys have always maintained that the amendment did not apply to Rule 68 offers because prejudgment interest is not interest on a judgment.

In today’s opinion, the Court of Appeals issued its third decision on the Metzler case (the first coming in 2011 and the second in 2012), finding that Rule 68 prejudgment interest is an “obligation” that falls under subsection (A) of A.R.S. 44-1201 and is therefore still subject to 10 percent interest, even after the 2011 amendment.

In May 2005, plaintiff Metzler was injured when she slipped and fell on a puddle of water leaking out of a Coca-Cola refrigerator inside a Fry’s grocery store. In May 2007, she offered to settle her case against BCI Coca-Cola for $150,000 via a Rule 68 offer to confess judgment. BCI Coca-Cola refused to settle. In August 2009, a jury awarded Metzler $1.5 million and found Coca-Cola 100% at fault.  

“This is a significant decision for all injured persons in the State of Arizona, and for all plaintiffs’ attorneys who utilize Rule 68 offers to confess judgment,” said Metzler’s attorney, Louis Hollingsworth of Hollingsworth Kelly, PLLC.

“Our law firm has been battling the defense bar and often the judiciary in Pima County for over two years on the Rule 68 prejudgment interest rate,” said Michael Kelly, who also represents Metzler.  “We have always maintained that when a plaintiff beats her offer to confess judgment, she is entitled to 10 percent prejudgment interest on the amount of the damages award, dating back to the date of the offer. We are very pleased with the Court’s favorable opinion in this matter, which now resolves the issue for all personal injury lawsuits in Arizona.”

https://www.hollingsworthlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/hollingsworth-kelly-attorneys-logo2015a.png 0 0 Hollingsworth Kelly Law Firm https://www.hollingsworthlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/hollingsworth-kelly-attorneys-logo2015a.png Hollingsworth Kelly Law Firm2013-08-28 23:24:192013-08-28 23:24:19Arizona Court of Appeals, Div. 2, Interprets Pre-Judgment Interest Rate in Metzler v. BCI Coca-Cola
Subscribeto RSS Feed

Recent Posts

  • Arizona Dust Storm Safety: Pull Aside, Stay Alive to Avoid Car AccidentsMay 11, 2025 - 12:28 pm
  • Distractions Put Teen Drivers at Risk for Car AccidentsMay 11, 2025 - 12:22 pm
  • What to Do After a Bicycle AccidentMay 29, 2019 - 10:46 am
  • Pedestrian Accidents Increase in ArizonaApril 10, 2019 - 3:02 pm
  • Talcum Powder Lawsuits Prove Strong Cancer RiskApril 3, 2019 - 4:24 pm
  • Know the Risks and Benefits of Medical DevicesMarch 27, 2019 - 4:36 pm
  • Practice Toy Safety Year-Round March 21, 2019 - 10:19 am
  • Driving and Cell Phones Are a Deadly CombinationFebruary 7, 2019 - 4:34 pm

Archives

OUR WEBSITE

Home
Results
Our Firm
Recognition

Practice Areas
Medical Malpractice
Motor Vehicle Accidents
Catastrophic & Serious Injury
Personal Injury

Blog
Contact

520.882.8080

Videos
Sitemap

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is provided for your information and is not intended to serve as legal advice. Transmitting information regarding your case does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship is established once a signed agreement has been executed. Consult an attorney for advice on any legal matter.


© Hollingsworth Kelly Law Firm
All rights reserved

3501 North Campbell, Suite 104
Tucson, Arizona 85719–2032

Scroll to top